testomat.io
About testomat.io
testomat.io pricing
testomat.io has a free version and offers a free trial. testomat.io paid version starts at US$30.00/month.
Alternatives to testomat.io
All testomat.io Reviews Apply filters
Browse testomat.io Reviews
All testomat.io Reviews Apply filters
This service may contain translations provided by google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement. Gartner's use of this provider is for operational purposes and does not constitute an endorsement of its products or services.
- Industry: Computer Software
- Company size: 2–10 Employees
- Used Weekly for 1-5 months
-
Review Source
Show more details
Excellent tool on the market, game changer!
Gulp of fresh air on the QA field
Pros
It allows work with tests inside team workflow, not only for QA managers in their unreadable spreadsheets
Cons
We always want more, but live connection via chats or social media makes Testomat different
Alternatives Considered
Zephyr ScaleReasons for Choosing testomat.io
Integration with Git, cool UI, UXSwitched From
Microsoft ExcelReasons for Switching to testomat.io
Not for Jira only, more active in development, modern tool- Industry: Computer Software
- Company size: 11–50 Employees
- Used Daily for 6-12 months
-
Review Source
Show more details
It is a very convenient platform for managing test cases
I often use the platform to write test cases and track identified issues. I monitor the team’s work and create bugs.
Pros
It is a very convenient platform for managing test cases. The continuous improvements to the platform are really pleasing—new features and enhancements are regularly added.
Cons
I can’t find any Cons — everything works perfectly for me. However, the layout could be improved for smaller screens.
- Industry: Financial Services
- Company size: 51–200 Employees
- Used Monthly for Free Trial
-
Review Source
Show more details
Great idea, but execution is not
Pros
The fact that the tests could be linked and synced
Cons
The really basic functionality of maintaining and managing steps for example. I don't see how that is anything special than just doing it in the IDE itself
- Industry: Computer Software
- Company size: 51–200 Employees
- Used Daily for 6-12 months
-
Review Source
Show more details
Best TMS out there
Use it every day. Still learning what else I can do with it. Don't consider anything else now
Pros
Built in tests results tracking. I can find why a test failed a month ago really easy. Testomat also has tons of cool useful features I love
Cons
It's relatively new so sometimes I could find bugs. But those are not critical and other TMS don't have such functionality to find bugs in :)
- Industry: Restaurants
- Company size: 11–50 Employees
- Used Daily for 1-5 months
-
Review Source
Show more details
Navigating Test Case Management with Testomat.io: A Personal Insight
I have experience with Redmine and TestRail. Testomat.io is different from these tools because it allows you to sync test cases directly from the code, which reduces maintenance costs. However, sometimes I find the UI not very user-friendly; this might be because I am used to pop-up UIs rather than having buttons on the side tab. Overall, Testomat.io is a good product, but there’s room for improvement.
Pros
Testomat.io supports BDD, JIRA, and Confluence. When I was looking to introduce modern testing practices to my company, we needed a tool that could help manage our test cases, including manual test cases, acceptance test cases, and other types of tests (such as integration tests, etc.). Testomat.io proved to be exactly what we needed.
Cons
My company develops AIoT products, and I have to use different testing frameworks for various purposes. For example, I write acceptance test cases using Gherkin and Python for the backend, and TypeScript for the frontend. However, it can be challenging to manage all the test cases in a single project. I often have to create multiple projects for the same product to accommodate the different testing requirements.
- 1
- 2