--- description: Review of SkillPanel Software: system overview, features, price and cost information. Get free demos and compare to similar programs. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: SkillPanel | Reviews, Pricing & Demos - SoftwareAdvice GB --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Pre-employment Testing Software](/directory/3654/pre-employment-assessment-tools/software) > [SkillPanel](/software/20219/devskiller) # SkillPanel Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.co.uk/software/20219/devskiller Page: 1 / 3\ Next: [Next page](https://www.softwareadvice.co.uk/software/20219/devskiller?page=2) > SkillPanel is a skills intelligence platform that helps HR and L\&D leaders see every skill across their organization, close capability gaps, and align talent to business goals. AI-powered talent insights give visibility into strengths, risks, and future needs, while integrated analytics turn data into clear action. Employees gain transparent career paths that show required skills for target roles and track progress toward them, increasing engagement and mobility. Multi-source assessments deliver credible skill profiles that guide promotions, internal moves, and succession planning. Designed to work with your existing HR systems, SkillPanel integrates seamlessly to provide a single source of truth for workforce capabilities, enabling faster, more confident talent decisions. > > Verdict: Rated **4.8/5** by 54 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.8/5** | 54 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: DevSkiller - **Founded**: 2013 ## Commercial Context - **Pricing model**: (Free Trial) - **Pricing Details**: Monthly pricing based on number of users and additional features needed. - **Target Audience**: 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, American Samoa, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua & Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium and 209 more ## Features - API - Activity Dashboard - Activity Tracking - Applicant Tracking - Aptitude Testing - Assessment Management - Automatic Grading - Candidate Comparison - Candidate Management - Certification & Licensing - Content Library - Customisable Branding - Customisable Questions - Customisable Reports - Customisable Templates - Customisable Tests - Data Import/Export - Email Reminders - Individualised Assessments - Onboarding ## Integrations (7 total) - Greenhouse - JazzHR - Lever - SmartRecruiters - Teamtailor - Tellent Recruitee - Workable ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base - Chat ## Category - [Pre-employment Testing Software](https://www.softwareadvice.co.uk/directory/3654/pre-employment-assessment-tools/software) ## Related Categories - [Pre-employment Testing Software](https://www.softwareadvice.co.uk/directory/3654/pre-employment-assessment-tools/software) - [Talent Management Software](https://www.softwareadvice.co.uk/directory/371/talent-management-software/software) - [Assessment Software](https://www.softwareadvice.co.uk/directory/4132/assessment/software) - [Recruitment Software](https://www.softwareadvice.co.uk/directory/372/recruiting-software/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Criteria](https://www.softwareadvice.co.uk/software/75159/hireselect) — 4.7/5 (188 reviews) 2. [Manatal](https://www.softwareadvice.co.uk/software/71033/manatal) — 4.6/5 (141 reviews) 3. [Talview](https://www.softwareadvice.co.uk/software/31465/talview-video-interviews) — 4.2/5 (42 reviews) 4. [TestGorilla](https://www.softwareadvice.co.uk/software/485798/TestGorilla) — 4.1/5 (265 reviews) 5. [Paycor](https://www.softwareadvice.co.uk/software/414126/paycor-perform) — 4.3/5 (3033 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Great results and outstanding customer service :)" — 5.0/5 > **Vivien** | *2 October 2020* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: They helped us reduce the candidate droput rate by 40% during the technical screening. They also helped us save hours of time both for the recruitment and tech teams. > > **Cons**: Although they have great predefined tests, we prefer our own ones which are a bit trickier to set up and automate the correction. But anyways, it is great the we can customize it and it still saves a lot of time even if there are some parts of the solutions that we have to check manually. > > We are really happy with the tool, it is absolutely user-friendly, customizable and effective. The account manager and the support team are very responsive and helpful. ----- ### "Good for the nitty-gritty, surprising what you'll find out about your candidates" — 5.0/5 > **Ash** | *31 August 2020* | Museums & Institutions | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: The depth at which you could assess candidates. For example, you can assess them on a range of code libraries - my focus was on Vue.js. The answers are not findable in Google and the company have internal tools to ensure this, so developers won't be able to find the answers on Stack Overflow by searching them. The questions are good, the multiple choice questions are challenging enough to prevent people from simply guessing (or the old cliche of choosing 'c'), particularly the questions that require you to choose multiple options (one or many answers to a question). The programming exercises are really the creme de la creme though, I was actually really surprised at the differences between candidates at different seniorities. These are not questions you can find in Google, these are live programming exercises which have a number of tests that need to be passed. You can view the approach, you can check their abilities to use GIT, you can use cheating-prevention mechanisms. > > **Cons**: The pricing structure is a little bit restrictive and it would be great if it was more modular. That said, I moaned about this to their customer services team and they were very helpful in helping us find a fit. The interface is a little cumbersome at times when trying to build tests. > > We needed to find a developer that suited our team, both in terms of personality and in terms of coding abilities. Tests are never a perfect way to assess a candidate alone, but they should be used in conjunction with other information (as some people just perform badly in tests). I am really happy with the information that Devskiller is surfacing on the candidates that we are getting in, it is surprising how different seniorities of developers perform (or don't perform). I assessed a few options before choosing the tool, this one seemed to be the best option and has certainly been good for us. Excellent customer service and very clear results reporting. ----- ### "It's a great platform and saved me time and has improved the hiring process" — 4.0/5 > **Willian** | *28 February 2018* | Graphic Design | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Pros**: Great database of tests, the plagiarism detection helps a lot and the possibility to create custom tests. > > **Cons**: For big tests (\>3h), I had some issues with the platform not loading the test, but the Customer Support was excellent and fast solving that issue. ----- ### "Excellent Software" — 5.0/5 > **Ned** | *15 January 2023* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: Setting up new tests is easy, with so many preconfigured selections (by language) - which can then be tailored as appropriate. The tests are less about random syntax questions, and more about fixing broken code or doing pair programming. > > **Cons**: Sometimes candidates struggle to operate the coding challenge console - or they try and do it external to the platform, then upload. But I don't see that as a DevSkiller, more the nature of the beast. In a few cases I have let the candidate retake the test if they give a plausible explanation for why it didn't work. > > No complaints, it has been a positive experience. I will try and take advantage of more of the features, there are a lot\! ----- ### "Awesome\!" — 5.0/5 > **Jonatan** | *17 February 2018* > > **Pros**: DevSkiller helps make tech recruiting easier, faster, and smoother because it provides many different tests for various programming languages, libraries and technologies, with different difficulty levels. The tests include real programming projects and not only questions which I think is very valuable. The rating of the tests is automatic and takes into consideration not only implemented functionality but also coding style, following best practices etc. It is also very easy to use. > > **Cons**: I have found no real drawbacks to DevSkiller. What might further improve the product would be to keep building the test library with options to test even more libs/languages. ----- Page: 1 / 3\ Next: [Next page](https://www.softwareadvice.co.uk/software/20219/devskiller?page=2) ## Links - [View on SoftwareAdvice](https://www.softwareadvice.co.uk/software/20219/devskiller) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | ----- ## Structured Data