--- description: Review of BrowserStack Software: system overview, features, price and cost information. Get free demos and compare to similar programs. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: BrowserStack | Reviews, Pricing & Demos - SoftwareAdvice GB --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Bug Tracking Software](/directory/4721/bug-tracking/software) > [BrowserStack](/software/200650/browserstack) # BrowserStack Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.co.uk/software/200650/browserstack Page: 1 / 32\ Next: [Next page](https://www.softwareadvice.co.uk/software/200650/browserstack?page=2) > BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers \& QAs to expand test coverage, scale, and optimize testing. BrowserStack is used by teams and organizations of all sizes - whether testing manually, starting test automation, or scaling automation. Over 50,000 customers, including Amazon, Paypal, Well Fargo Bank, Nvidia, MongoDB, Pfizer, GE, Discovery, React JS, Apache, JQuery and several others rely on BrowserStack to test their web \& mobile apps. We help them: - Expand test coverage with cross-browser, real device, accessibility, and visual testing. - Scale test automation with BrowserStack's leading cross-browser \& real device cloud and test observability. - Centralise and scale testing processes with test management. - Unlock testing \& quality insights. Our Products: Live - Manual cross-browser testing App Live - Manual real-device testing Automate - Browser automation grid App Automate - Real device automation cloud Percy - Automated visual testing and review Low code automation - Test automation without coding Accessibility Testing - Test WCAG and ADA compliance Test Management - Unify and track all test cases Test Observability - Test debugging \& insights > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 774 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.6/5** | 774 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: BrowserStack - **Founded**: 2011 ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: US$39.00 - **Pricing model**: Flat Rate (Free version available) (Free Trial) - **Pricing Details**: BrowserStack offers a free trial for new users, after which the software is available on monthly and annual subscriptions. An open-source version is also available. Pricing and functionality scales with the number of tests, users, or screenshots. Live: Starts at $29/month (billed annually) and $39/month (billed monthly) Automate Pro: Starts at $129/month (billed annually) and $169/month (billed monthly) Automate Mobile: Starts at $199/month (billed annually) and $249/month (billed monthly) Percy: A free version is available for visual testing on 5000 screenshots and unlimited users Percy Professional: Starts at $99/month (billed annually) and 129/month (billed monthly) for 25,000 screenshots/month App Live: Starts at $29/month (billed annually) and $39/month (billed monthly) App Automate: A free version includes 30 interactive testing minutes, 100 automated testing minutes daily, and 4 real mobile devices. Subscription starts at $159/month (billed annually) and $199/month (billed monthly) - **Target Audience**: Self Employed, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop) - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Australia, Brazil, British Virgin Islands, Canada, Denmark, Germany, India, Ireland, Israel, Mexico, Singapore, South Africa, US Virgin Islands, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States ## Features - A/B Testing - AI/Machine Learning - API - Access Controls/Permissions - Action-Word Testing - Activity Dashboard - Activity Monitoring - Activity Tracking - Alerts/Escalation - Alerts/Notifications - Annotations - Anomaly Detection - Approval Workflow - Archiving & Retention - Assessment Management - Asset Discovery - Audience Targeting - Audit Management - Audit Trail - Automated Testing ## Integrations (16 total) - Appium - Bitbucket - CircleCI - Cypress - Espresso - GitHub - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Slack - Travis CI - Trello - Tricentis qTest - WordPress ... and 1 more integrations ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base - Phone Support - Chat ## Category - [Bug Tracking Software](https://www.softwareadvice.co.uk/directory/4721/bug-tracking/software) ## Related Categories - [Bug Tracking Software](https://www.softwareadvice.co.uk/directory/4721/bug-tracking/software) - [Automation Testing Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.co.uk/directory/4187/automation-testing/software) - [Test Management Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.co.uk/directory/4622/test-management-tools/software) - [Performance Testing Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.co.uk/directory/4316/performance-testing/software) - [Observability Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.co.uk/directory/4534/observability/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Lyssna](https://www.softwareadvice.co.uk/software/144529/usabilityhub) — 4.6/5 (86 reviews) 2. [QA Wolf](https://www.softwareadvice.co.uk/software/370367/qa-wolf) — 5.0/5 (69 reviews) 3. [TestRail](https://www.softwareadvice.co.uk/software/76542/testrail) — 4.3/5 (179 reviews) 4. [Lightster](https://www.softwareadvice.co.uk/software/440012/lightster) — 4.7/5 (9 reviews) 5. [testomat.io](https://www.softwareadvice.co.uk/software/429510/testomat-io) — 4.8/5 (22 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Reliable Cross-Platform Testing with Some Cost Considerations" — 4.0/5 > **Azmal** | *2 April 2026* | Education Management | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Pros**: The biggest advantage of BrowserStack is its instant access to a wide range of real devices without needing to maintain physical hardware. The ability to perform live, manual testing on both iOS and Android devices directly from the browser is extremely convenient and saves a lot of setup time. I also found the platform very useful for: Quick debugging with real-time interaction Consistent performance across devices and OS versions Ease of use — no complex installation or configuration required Reliable cloud infrastructure, which makes testing smooth even for remote teams Overall, it significantly improves testing efficiency and helps identify real-world issues that emulators often miss. > > **Cons**: The main drawback is the cost, especially for small teams or when you need extended access to real devices for manual testing. I also faced a few practical limitations: Session time limits and concurrency restrictions can slow down testing when multiple testers are involved Occasional lag or latency, particularly when network conditions aren’t ideal Limited free access, making it harder to evaluate thoroughly before committing Device availability issues at peak times (some popular devices are not always instantly accessible) > > My overall experience with BrowserStack has been very positive. It provides a reliable and efficient platform for testing applications across a wide range of real devices and browsers without the need to maintain physical infrastructure. The ability to perform live, manual testing on real iOS and Android devices is a major advantage, helping to identify real-world issues that are often missed in emulators. The platform is easy to use, quick to set up, and integrates well into existing testing workflows. However, there are some limitations, such as pricing, session limits, and occasional latency, which can impact productivity during heavy usage. Overall, it is a powerful and practical solution for cross-platform testing, especially for teams that need quick access to multiple devices, but it may require careful cost management depending on usage. ----- ### "Everything under a single umbrella\!" — 5.0/5 > **Sarav** | *7 April 2026* | Financial Services | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: it offers a variety of features from mobile devices to test, manage reports and integration with tools like jira and CI/CD pipelines > > **Cons**: Connectivity issues while performing Device testing. This is not all the time, however, i do face this issue from time to time. > > Overall a great SaaS application which makes life easy since it offers all major featureslike tools to ttest, report and integration with other apps. All in one\! ----- ### "Focus on Future Nitche" — 3.0/5 > **Acharaj** | *1 April 2026* | Information Services | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Pros**: Its Test Bed capacities Its Evaluation Matrix Improvisation (which is not live yet) All in one solution > > **Cons**: Self Healing Feature is still not up to the mark Prompt Design Engg \& Self Feedback Looping- You should be focusing on this more. This is the backbone of AI generated tests. Less competitive as compare to their nitche players > > Good, but i think product should be taking a deep review of the other good players in market like TestIM, Promptfoo.com for different features. From there they can get some references \& get good features implemented. ----- ### "Reliable and Efficient Testing Platform with Minor Drawbacks" — 5.0/5 > **Arfa** | *26 March 2026* | Apparel & Fashion | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: its extensive real device and browser coverage, which makes cross-browser testing seamless and reliable. The ease of use and quick setup allow teams to start testing without heavy configuration. It significantly speeds up testing cycles and helps identify issues early, improving overall product quality > > **Cons**: its pricing, which can be quite high for smaller teams. Additionally, automation setup and debugging can be a bit complex, and session timeouts or flaky connections sometimes impact the overall testing experience. > > My overall experience with BrowserStack has been positive. It provides a reliable platform for cross-browser and real device testing, making it easier to identify and fix issues across different environments. The interface is user-friendly, and it helps speed up testing cycles significantly. While there are occasional performance lags and the pricing can be a concern, the overall value it delivers in terms of efficiency and test coverage makes it a strong tool for QA teams ----- ### "Awesome App" — 5.0/5 > **Mohd** | *2 April 2026* | Commercial Real Estate | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: Testing Test management Automation Including this you guys have tremendous devices support across the globe with specific network which I like most. > > **Cons**: Costing of the products :D, we like most of the thing to start but because of costing sometime it is not possible as many company don't want to spent that much amount. > > Thanks for giving chance to join the meet call It was good to see what all things can be done by using your platform. Really appreciate one part which you guys did that is low code for the non technical persons. It will help them a lot. ----- Page: 1 / 32\ Next: [Next page](https://www.softwareadvice.co.uk/software/200650/browserstack?page=2) ## Links - [View on SoftwareAdvice](https://www.softwareadvice.co.uk/software/200650/browserstack) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | fr | | ----- ## Structured Data